Be treated with dignity
Care should not involve humiliation, threats, violence or degrading punishment. Ask how concerns and complaints are handled.
Dignity is part of treatment
Right for Treatment stands against illegal and abusive de-addiction centres, and for care grounded in dignity and safety. This guide helps patients and families understand the safeguards to ask about and find official support.
A warning sign is a reason to ask questions—not proof that a centre has broken the law.
Move to a safer place if possible. Call India’s emergency response number 112 for police, fire or medical assistance.
Substance use does not make a person less deserving of safety, privacy or humane treatment. These principles can help start a conversation with a provider or a trusted supporter.
Care should not involve humiliation, threats, violence or degrading punishment. Ask how concerns and complaints are handled.
Where it is safe to do so, ask for a plain-language explanation of the care plan, likely risks, costs, staff qualifications and how to contact a responsible clinician.
Ask how consent, decision-making ability and any limits on a person's choices are assessed, documented and reviewed. The answer depends on the person and setting.
Ask who can see personal or medical information, and how someone can speak privately with a trusted person or raise a concern safely.
One or more concerns may warrant questions or independent advice. They do not, on their own, prove that a centre is unlawful. Context, state rules and the person's circumstances matter.
No clear answers. Staff will not explain the centre's identity, who is responsible for care, what treatment is proposed, or what it costs.
Isolation without explanation. A person cannot contact anyone they trust, learn how to raise a concern, or understand why communication is restricted.
Threats or degrading treatment. Reports of violence, intimidation, punishment or restraint with no clear clinical explanation and review.
Medical needs are ignored. A person appears unwell, injured, severely distressed or at risk of withdrawal, but cannot access timely qualified medical care.
Important information is withheld. Nobody will explain the basis for admission, the care plan, how medicines are managed, or how a person may ask for a review.
A possible pattern begins when a family in crisis is promised a quick solution and a private team—sometimes called “bouncers”—is hired to take someone away. Confinement, loss of contact, harmful treatment, release without continuing support, and another crisis may follow. This is a pattern to recognise, not a claim about every family or centre and not, by itself, proof of an offence.
The promise
A worried relative may be told that a “quick pickup,” total separation, or a guaranteed cure is the only option. A broker or facility may not clearly explain who will transport the person, what authority is being relied on, or what the treatment will involve.
Ask: Who is responsible, what is the clinical plan, and what lawful authority—if any—permits a non-consensual transfer?
The pickup
Private crew members may use force, restraint, threats or deception to move someone. Calling a team “bouncers,” or saying that a family requested the transfer, does not by itself establish whether the transfer was lawful. The facts and any actual legal authority matter.
Possible legal issue: BNS section 126 concerns wrongful restraint; sections 137–138 address defined forms of kidnapping and abduction. Their elements are specific.
The confinement
At the facility, a person may report locked exits, guards blocking movement, or being kept within a building or grounds. If movement is wrongfully blocked or a person is confined within limits, BNS sections 126–127 may warrant legal review; the section’s elements, lawful authority and any applicable safeguards must be assessed.
Warning sign: Nobody can explain the basis, review process, duration, or safe route for raising a concern.
The outside world disappears
Phones, identity documents or personal belongings may be taken. Calls, visits, messages, private medical conversations or access to an independent adviser may be blocked. A device restriction alone does not decide legality, but secrecy and isolation can make it much harder to ask for help or check on someone’s safety.
Check: Can the person speak to a trusted person or clinician, and can someone independently verify their wellbeing?
Harm without recourse
Allegations can include hitting, threats, humiliation, punishment, unsafe restraint, untreated injury or a medical crisis being ignored. Depending on the evidence and statutory elements, BNS provisions on hurt, grievous hurt, assault or criminal force, and criminal intimidation may be relevant. A report is a reason to seek an independent assessment, not a court finding.
Keep safety first: Seek urgent medical attention for injury, severe distress, overdose or dangerous withdrawal.
Release, crisis, return
If someone leaves without continuing clinical care, a realistic follow-up plan or community support, difficult needs may remain. A return to substance use can have many causes; it is not a moral failure and does not justify violence, punishment or automatic confinement. A family may then be frightened into arranging another pickup and re-admission.
Break the loop: Ask about qualified treatment, voluntary choices where possible, medical follow-up, aftercare and a safe way to raise concerns.
For families: watch for the sales pitch
Fear, exhaustion, stigma and a lack of reliable information can make a promise of a “guaranteed cure” sound convincing. Be cautious if anyone:
Before arranging care, ask how admission is being authorised, who can explain it to the person, how contact and medical needs are handled, and what aftercare will look like.
Support and accountability can coexist
A worried or misled family is not automatically criminally responsible. But concern does not make every decision harmless. Knowingly arranging a forceful pickup, instructing a facility to confine someone or cut all contact, or deliberately helping conceal abuse may raise serious legal questions.
The BNS addresses abetment, conspiracy and acts carried out with a shared common intention. Those provisions require specific legal elements and evidence. A family relationship, a payment, or mere presence is not proof of guilt.
If you arranged admission and later learn that the person cannot leave or may be harmed, do not rely only on the centre’s account. Seek an independent medical and legal review, and contact an appropriate authority when safe.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is India’s criminal law. These section numbers are possible issue areas—not charges, conclusions, or a legal opinion about any person or centre.
Preventing someone from proceeding where they have a right to go, or wrongfully keeping them within defined limits. Section 127 also addresses particular circumstances such as prolonged or concealed confinement.
Possible provisions where bodily pain, injury or specified dangerous means are alleged. The Act defines the terms and requires its own elements; an allegation alone is not proof.
Sections 129–130 define criminal force and assault; section 131 sets out punishment for assault or criminal force otherwise than on grave provocation.
May be relevant to threats only where the section’s requirements—including the specified intent—are supported by the facts.
Section 45 covers defined forms of abetment, including intentional aid; section 61 addresses criminal conspiracy; section 3(5) concerns a criminal act by several people in furtherance of their common intention. The elements differ.
These provisions define specific situations. Their titles should not be used as shorthand for every disputed transport; the person’s age or legal status, the means used, purpose and related provisions matter.
There is no single path for every situation. Take only the steps that are safe and relevant to you.
Immediate danger or a medical emergency?
Call 112 from a safe place. Do not try to manage a severe medical crisis or withdrawal alone.
If you can, move to a safe place and contact a trusted person. If someone may be seriously unwell, seek urgent qualified medical help.
When it is safe, note dates, names, what you observed, costs and conversations. Keep copies of documents you already have lawful access to. Do not put anyone at risk to gather evidence.
Depending on the facility and concern, seek guidance from the relevant state or UT health department, State Mental Health Authority, district health office or local police. Which body is responsible can vary.
Ask about free legal services through NALSA. For a human-rights concern, the official NHRC/State Human Rights Commission portal explains complaint steps and required verification.
Consider whether public posts, names, photos or medical details could identify someone or increase risk. Share only what is necessary with a trusted professional or authority.
These links go to public authorities and official services. Service availability and procedures may change; check each official page for current details.
Helplines are not a substitute for emergency response. If a person is in immediate danger, call 112.
For general advocacy enquiries, write to us. Please share only what you are comfortable sending. Email is not an emergency channel, and this website does not collect a contact form or case details.
Not emergency support. This site is an information and advocacy resource. It is not monitored as an emergency channel; call 112 if someone is in immediate danger.
Not medical or legal advice. Nothing here assesses an individual, substitutes for qualified care, or determines whether a particular centre has acted unlawfully. Laws and complaint routes may depend on the facility, facts and state or UT.
Privacy. This page has no contact form or file uploads; injected site analytics and the optional platform badge are disabled. Hosting or CDN services may still process technical data under their own policies. Email is not guaranteed private or secure; avoid sending sensitive identity or health information unless you have considered the risks.
Links are for information. Official resources are linked for convenience. Their inclusion is not an endorsement of a particular facility or outcome.